Why I haven't started and won't be blogging Le Chevalier D'Eon

Instead of explaining myself with words, I’m going to let the following screenshots do the talking.

Examine, ladies and gentlemen, Exhibit A taken from episode 2 of the show:

deon02.jpg

Doesn’t that look nice? Now take a look at Exhibit B taken from episode 4:

deon04.jpg

Wha… what is this? What happened?

Production I.G., you disappoint and sadden me. I’ll continue to follow d’Eon, but my respect for I.G. has just gone down the drain. It’s true that few company can maintain the same consistent quality throughout an entire series – why else is Kyoto Animation so highly esteemed? – but to drop the ball so hard in episode 4 is simply unacceptable

On the other hand, occasionally there’s some pretty cool facial distortions (not to be confused by ‘emo facial contortions’, as popularised by Jason Miao of AoMM fame), as demonstrated by Shinobuden:

Episode 1 (and most of the show):

shinobuden01.jpg

Episode 9 second half:

shinobuden09.jpg

Isn’t the second Shinobu-chan so much cuter?

This entry was posted in Editorials. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

11 Comments

  1. Posted October 27, 2006 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Art is secondary.. but Chevalier is godly boring.

    Then again, IG did GitS:SAC so they own.

  2. Posted October 27, 2006 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Actually, I prefer the puni puni Shinobu… but that’s me…

  3. Dr. Slump
    Posted October 27, 2006 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    Clearly, they changed the color scheme to reflect the low light of the street at night. It’s not a mistake, and I found, watching the episodes, that it worked quite effectively to maintain the atmosphere of the setting.

  4. alkanphel
    Posted October 27, 2006 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    It’s not new to IG though, when they did GITS:SAC, the Major’s face was drawn quite differently in almost every episode. I remember seeing a picture that compiled at least 20 unique and different faces of her from the anime.

  5. negativzero
    Posted October 28, 2006 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    Well, thats cel-shading for you. at different angles, the pics can look markedly different from one another.

    anyways, i do believe i’ll still follow chevalier. chances are it may end up my fav series of the summer season.

    facial expressions aside, it probably has one of the most beautiful art direction and backgrounds i’ve ever seen. and although this is a historical anime, the story still intrigues and it prob has some of the most deep character development in any anime i’ve ever seen.

    but most importantly, androgyny rawks. ^___^

  6. alkanphel
    Posted October 28, 2006 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    Is that really true cel-shading? I thought the true cel-shading is like the Appleseed movie.

  7. negativzero
    Posted October 28, 2006 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    not really sure, but it looks uncannily like cel-shading.

  8. alkanphel
    Posted October 28, 2006 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Well I’m not convinced about it being cel-shaded but it does look computer-shaded.

  9. Posted October 28, 2006 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    TJ: I actually think the story is quite interesting, or at least as far as I’ve seen it anyway.

    kacpy: Sifness… pointy chin Shinobu ftw.

    The rest of you: It’s not the colour… I have nothing against the colours. The faces in that second d’Eon pic just look absolutely terrible. That stuff is to be expected, but I really can’t accept having it happen so early on in the live span of a show. If it keeps going like this it’ll end up looking like it was drawn by a 3 years old.

  10. Posted October 28, 2006 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    LOL I didn’t even notice that…

    That’s why everyone’s been saying that the animation has been dropping as of late. Meh, even with that one fault, it’s still a great series.

  11. alkanphel
    Posted October 29, 2006 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    Nah as an overall, the animation line-art quality of Chevalier has been slowly dropping ever since the superb first episode.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>